Yes
No
IBIS G0D
this. so much. if you're uncertain at all, msg another admin (hell i'll look at demos most of the time too) on steam, or post in the admin section before taking action. of course you still have to put a thread like this up, but just make sure before taking action. better to ban someone a few days after the incident than to ban them and have them pissed at the community for a week while they await the processOriginally Posted by maynard
ot: i don't see anything really fishy
Through the darkness of futures past,
The magician longs to see
One chants out between two worlds:
Fire, walk with me.
IBIS Master
Make up your mind man.
IBIS
^ hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahaa
... what's with the bipolar comments on this thread? ...
IBIS
.....^
Maynard - The WCS Guy
IBIS G0D
haha brett your in the spot light!
Rosh, at any rate, you made the right decision. Its better to ban and review then to not ban and let a potential hacker continue to reign.
Personal reform
IBIS
actually he made the wrong decision as I already stated. if you're not confident in your ban, do not ban the person, this is nothing new...
it can take anywhere from 2-5 days for a thread 2 be handled, it's not fair for someone whose not hacking, 2 have 2 wait that period of time just cause you're iffy about something, and not even sure 2 begin with if the person hacks.
Last edited by maynard; 02-10-2012 at 10:47 AM.
IBIS G0D
holy crap i was off last night. i watched a different demo that i had just pulled of a different player entirely and posted that response on this thread.
i also kept telling my gf to put off her paper til tomorrow and she kept telling me IT'S DUE AT 9 AM TOMORROW and i was like just do it over the weekend or something. god yesterday was fuckin terrible for me XD
just watched it one more time, and for my final verdict, it certainly looks like walls at some points, but i have noticed that the locations of moving player models on sourcetv are way off, and reg is even crazier. i saw something crazy with lagi the other day, he was aiming at a dude's knee, stationary, crouched with the awp...shoots his head. then he's shooting full auto with a krieg, landing shots around the dude's legs, then the killshot is a headshot when the head isn't even visible. i see the same sorts of things several times in this demo, so the most telling times, when he seems to trace someone who's just out of his view, blocked by a wall, he could've actually seen that player due to lag and other things. that makes it tough to say for sure...as i said in my first post it does certainly look like walls. but that could just be the demo being screwy. not sure what can be done about that if anything...it's pretty damn impossible for a 3rd party to accurately show what 2 different players see when lag's involved. when you take this into consideration, and that most other instances where it looks like it could be walls can be explained by sound or radar and there are no cross-map walltraces or anything like that...i'd say it's not conclusive, and not enough for a ban. i do still stand by my first post, it LOOKS like walls throughout...but i bet if i watched myself i'd say the same thing.
Last edited by brett friggin favre; 02-10-2012 at 11:10 AM.
Through the darkness of futures past,
The magician longs to see
One chants out between two worlds:
Fire, walk with me.
IBIS G0D
If that is the case then your stand point has changed regarding making bans for hacks when you arnt100% sure. As before it was about letting the review process unfold vs letting a potential hacker run free because someone wasn't 100% positive. Better safe then sorry so to speak.
Personal reform
IBIS
ohhhh suck it maymay!!!.....
i was laughing at how many people said smthn like " hackss!!!" and then... " i dnt see hacks"..
i was about to comment about it , when i read rosie's comment! (that bitch stole my comment!)
IBIS G0D
Pretty sure it was just Brett who changed his position.
Back on topic to help ula's expodite his case
Personal reform
Posting Permissions
Register To Reply
